Skip to content

Novacura Flow Connect

Welcome to the ideas forum for Novacura Flow Connect. Please share your ideas for how we can make Novacura Flow Connect better. We are listening and we use this feedback to prioritize our roadmap!

Novacura Flow Connect

Categories

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

70 results found

  1. When I add a component to a workflow I want to have all the component parameters as a default input to the component when I add it to a workflow.

    As it is now I have to open the component to figure out what parameters to use, copy them and paste them into the component step in the workflow.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Designer  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Thank you for voting on this feature request. Our product team is currently reviewing it and evaluating its feasibility and potential impact. We will keep you updated on any progress.

  2. I want to be able to define the data types for my SQL query so that the Designer knows the types I can work with when designing my apps and components.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Designer  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. When I'm importing a Flow 6 file with a lot of fragments, I need to open all new components and commit a version before I can use them in my app. This is very time consuming.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Designer  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Thank you for voting on this feature request. Our product team is currently reviewing it and evaluating its feasibility and potential impact. We will keep you updated on any progress.

  4. In the Portal 2 environment, users must manually adjust the scheduler's view daily to align it with the current time. This manual process becomes inefficient for users, especially in environments where the scheduler is in a read-only state across all departments.

    Proposed solution is to implement an auto-centering feature for the Portal 2 scheduler that automatically aligns the view with the current time upon refresh. This ensures that users always have a centered view of their schedule relative to the present time without manual adjustments, enhancing user experience and operational efficiency.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Portal  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. Currently, users must manually select dates in both the filter portlet and the Gantt date picker when they wish to restrict the data source to specific dates. This process is tedious and requires the portlet to load twice.

    We propose a feature that allows synchronization between date pickers in the filter portlet and the Gantt. There should be a setting in the listening portlet that enables users to link its date pickers to one or two date pickers in the filter portlet. When the user filters on specific dates, the linked date pickers should automatically update, reducing manual steps and…

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Portal  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. Currently, when users render a result in the scheduler, then navigate to a different page, and later return to the scheduler page, the previously rendered result is not retained. This behavior contrasts with the functionality found in the filter portlets and the Gantt portlet, where results persist through page navigation.

    We propose that the scheduler should retain the rendered results even after navigating to a different page and then returning. This persistent rendering will provide a more consistent user experience and align the scheduler's functionality with other parts of the system.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Portal 2  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Thank you for voting on this feature request. Our product team is currently reviewing it and evaluating its feasibility and potential impact. We will keep you updated on any progress.

  7. Currently, the visual emphasis when an object is selected in the Scheduler is quite subtle. This could potentially cause users to struggle in identifying their selected object, especially in a dense schedule.

    We suggest enhancing the object highlighting functionality in the Scheduler. This could involve introducing a more pronounced visual cue, like a more prominent shadow or highlight. It would be beneficial to make the intensity of this visual cue customizable. Additionally, users should be allowed to choose the color of the highlight, providing another layer of customization and personalization.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Portal  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Thank you for voting on this feature request. Our product team is currently reviewing it and evaluating its feasibility and potential impact. We will keep you updated on any progress.

  8. In Portal2, when using a List of Values (LoV) tied to a table column, there seems to be an issue displaying the data if the LoV's data source is a Flow with an input filter. The data is displayed if no input filter is considered, but it does not show up when inputs are taken from Portal.

    Proposed solution is to address the inconsistency by ensuring that the List of Values in Portal2 displays data correctly even when the LoV uses a Flow with input filters from Portal. It's crucial to provide consistent visibility and accessibility of data irrespective of…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Portal 2  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. Currently, to have editable columns in a table, 'Edit Operations' must be enabled. This approach allows only the usage of pre-set buttons named "Update/Delete/Create". However, in some contexts, these pre-set names are not suitable or meaningful to the end-users.

    We suggest allowing customization of the button names in 'Edit Operations'. This feature will allow users to rename the "Update/Delete/Create" buttons to terms that better fit their specific use cases.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    under review  ·  0 comments  ·  Portal  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. Currently Portal 2 datepicker has separate date and time pickers. This feature request would allow users to set both date and time by pressing the "Today" button.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Portal  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
1 2 4 Next →
  • Don't see your idea?