Skip to content

Novacura Flow Connect

Welcome to the ideas forum for Novacura Flow Connect. Please share your ideas for how we can make Novacura Flow Connect better. We are listening and we use this feedback to prioritize our roadmap!

Novacura Flow Connect

Categories

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

9 results found

  1. To be able to communicate with SFTP/FTP systems in Flow Connect

    11 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Connectors  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. A generic database connector that can connect to any database for which an ODBC driver is available

    Databases that we can Connect to via ODBC
    IBM Db2 (all variants)
    MySQL / MariaDB (MySQL Connector/ODBC, MariaDB Connector/ODBC)
    PostgreSQL (psqlODBC driver)
    SQLite (SQLite ODBC driver)
    SAP HANA (SAP HANA ODBC driver)

    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Connectors  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. HTML to PDF connector is a frequently used connector for designing and generating PDF reports in Flow Classic. Additionally, it's also possible to merge existing pdfs with this connector.
    As mentioned in this idea https://ideas.novacura.com/forums/956630-novacura-flow-connect/suggestions/48235034-add-proper-report-print-layout-configuration-to-fl
    The design capabilities of the existing connector are somewhat limited/rigid. Ideally, it should be far easier/flexible to design a report layout in connect. Here are some options we can consider for HTML to PDF connector in Flow Connect.

    Option 1

    Can be divided in to two sub sections.
    a. Report design as its own step in the designer – The idea of this is to…

    37 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Connectors  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We are happy to inform you that development work has begun on your requested feature. Our product team has assigned resources and is actively working on implementing it. We will keep you updated on its progress.

  4. Client accessing IFS via Flow Connect wants to be able to restrict access to some tables, even for developers. In Flow Classic you could set up connector so user was simultaneously login in to IFS and Flow, so he was not using IFSAPP user to gain access, but his own level of privilege. I'd like to be able to present to client's similar functionality, since currently we can set up connector with single login/password per environment.

    Moreover login with multiple flow users in single IFS user seems like license issue waiting to happen.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Connectors  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. Support for Web Service Connector in Flow Connect

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Connectors  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. It would be nice if we could log somehow if an enduser run a workflow and during a REST call an error occurs, then later a developer could check these log files. Or if the issue is not reproducable in DEV environment, only in PROD/TEST env. (like a similar functionality in Flow Classic).

    A use-case from partner:
    "If the user experience problems occasionally and we can’t recreate it in the debug.
    Another example, sometimes when I get long responetimes during testing I cannot see if that is because of M3 or not. Next time I run it it is quick…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Connectors  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. In some connectors for example FileSystem we need the ability to handle errors and sometimes ignore them.

    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Connectors  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. Users encounter an issue when changing connectors for a specific flow. Currently, when an operation result indicates a failure, it is challenging to pinpoint which step within the flow has encountered the issue. As a result, users are compelled to manually review each step to identify the failed ones, causing unnecessary delays and frustration.

    8 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Connectors  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Thank you for voting on this feature request. Our product team is currently reviewing it and evaluating its feasibility and potential impact. We will keep you updated on any progress.

  9. we would like to use both the eq and the in operator on the same entity within a set and if the IN operator consist of only one “value” then the connector will crash and give the following error “Operation failed. Multiple key predicates cannot be specified for the same entity set.“ but if you set more than one “value” it will work as intended.

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Connectors  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  • Don't see your idea?