Skip to content

Novacura Flow Connect

Welcome to the ideas forum for Novacura Flow Connect. Please share your ideas for how we can make Novacura Flow Connect better. We are listening and we use this feedback to prioritize our roadmap!

Novacura Flow Connect

Categories

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

7 results found

  1. Utilize the old connector for integration with Nicelabel. Currently the workaround is to use the REST connector or FileSystem connector to communicate but it could require an automation server or additional set up to consume messages in the file system directory.

    14 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Connectors  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    The feature request has been approved and is now scheduled for development. Our product team has determined that it aligns with our product roadmap and will bring value to our platform. We will keep you updated on its progress.

  2. Change Improvement Request: Support Parameterized IN Syntax for SQL Statements

    Title
    Support parameterized IN clause syntax to avoid dynamic SQL execution

    Background / Current Behavior

    Currently, when building SQL queries that require filtering using an IN clause with multiple values, the only practical solution is to dynamically construct the SQL string and execute it using EXEC(@query).

    Example:

    DECLARE @query NVARCHAR(MAX)

    SET @query = '
    SELECT *
    FROM Orders
    WHERE OrderId IN (' + @OrderIds + ')
    '

    EXEC(@query)

    This approach requires stringifying the entire query, which introduces several issues:

    Reduced readability and maintainability

    Increased risk of SQL injection if not…

    8 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Connectors  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    The feature request has been approved and is now scheduled for development. Our product team has determined that it aligns with our product roadmap and will bring value to our platform. We will keep you updated on its progress.

  3. In Flow Classic, we have two connectors associated with M3. One is the REST based connector, the other is connector to older versions of Infor M3. In Flow Connect, we would like the same capabilities from Classic. Currently, only REST based connectors for Infor M3 are available.

    16 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Connectors  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    The feature request has been approved and is now scheduled for development. Our product team has determined that it aligns with our product roadmap and will bring value to our platform. We will keep you updated on its progress.

  4. he OPC UA connector allows Flow Connect apps to communicate with OPC UA servers

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Connectors  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    The feature request has been approved and is now scheduled for development. Our product team has determined that it aligns with our product roadmap and will bring value to our platform. We will keep you updated on its progress.

  5. There is currently no search option to filter the columns in the Translation tab

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Hub  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    The feature request has been approved and is now scheduled for development. Our product team has determined that it aligns with our product roadmap and will bring value to our platform. We will keep you updated on its progress.

  6. Our framework is currently stringent in how to work offline: you download your sources (like in the morning), start working (deliberately offline) and your transactions are synced as soon as you are back online.
    In many circumstances Flow users in service do not know whether they will have internet while working though and they work offline foregoing on many advantages of being online.
    Ideally, we would have a variable available in our start variables (like DeviceId and ClientType) so that in the flows we can take different paths depending on whether the user has internet or not - analog to…

    9 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    The feature request has been approved and is now scheduled for development. Our product team has determined that it aligns with our product roadmap and will bring value to our platform. We will keep you updated on its progress.

  7. We would like to use the same flow for multiple buttons in Portal 2. We use the input table to drive what the buttons do. Therefore, we would like to have that functionality in Portal 2 to connect one workflow to multiple buttons. Today, I need to duplicate the workflow to connect one button to one workflow. This adds unnecessary maintenance.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    The feature request has been approved and is now scheduled for development. Our product team has determined that it aligns with our product roadmap and will bring value to our platform. We will keep you updated on its progress.

  • Don't see your idea?