Skip to content
← How can we improve Novacura Flow?

Novacura Flow Connect

Welcome to the ideas forum for Novacura Flow Connect. Please share your ideas for how we can make Novacura Flow Connect better. We are listening and we use this feedback to prioritize our roadmap!

Novacura Flow Connect

Categories

(thinking…)

How can we improve Novacura Flow Connect?

(thinking…)

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

If a similar idea already exists, you can support and comment on it.

If it doesn't exist, you can post your idea so others can support it.

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

3 results found

  1. The possibility to handle errors in some connectors

    In some connectors for example FileSystem we need the ability to handle errors and sometimes ignore them.

    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Connectors  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  2. Enhanced Logging for Import Errors of OData Connector

    Users encounter an issue when changing connectors for a specific flow. Currently, when an operation result indicates a failure, it is challenging to pinpoint which step within the flow has encountered the issue. As a result, users are compelled to manually review each step to identify the failed ones, causing unnecessary delays and frustration.

    8 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Connectors  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    under review  ·  AdminIrshad Hassan (Admin, Novacura) responded

    Thank you for voting on this feature request. Our product team is currently reviewing it and evaluating its feasibility and potential impact. We will keep you updated on any progress.

  3. Allow eq and in operator on the same entity

    we would like to use both the eq and the in operator on the same entity within a set and if the IN operator consist of only one “value” then the connector will crash and give the following error “Operation failed. Multiple key predicates cannot be specified for the same entity set.“ but if you set more than one “value” it will work as intended.

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Connectors  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
  • Don't see your idea?