Skip to content

Novacura Flow Classic

Welcome to the ideas forum for Novacura Flow. Please share your ideas for how we can make Novacura Flow better. We are listening and we use this feedback to prioritize our roadmap!

Novacura Flow Classic

Categories

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

42 results found

  1. In the current configuration of Portal 2, locking the side menu causes it to overlay the main content area, leading to obscured or covered content. This can impair user interaction and accessibility, particularly when navigating or viewing crucial interface elements.

    Proposed solution is to modify the behavior of the Portal 2 interface so that when the side menu is locked, the main content area automatically adjusts to the right. This adjustment should ensure that no content is obscured by the locked menu. Implementing responsive design principles will allow the content to fluidly reposition and resize, maintaining usability and visibility regardless…

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Portal 2  ·  Admin →

    The configuration panel has been changed in Flow Connect Portal to improve the user experience.


    We regret to inform you that this feature request has been declined. Our product team has determined that it is not aligned with our product roadmap or does not bring enough value to our platform to justify its implementation. We appreciate your continued feedback and look forward to hearing about future ideas.


  2. Should be possible to reduce gaps (to set distance between next fields) between next fields in user step in flow triggered from ie. portal 2 or web client

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Portal 2  ·  Admin →

    The pop-up shows the old web client being executed from the portal. The UI is better in the new client so I would suggest changing to using that one.


    We regret to inform you that this feature request has been declined. Our product team has determined that it is not aligned with our product roadmap or does not bring enough value to our platform to justify its implementation. We appreciate your continued feedback and look forward to hearing about future ideas.

  3. Currently, the device management page in Studio uses model numbers as the default for the Name field. This approach is inadequate for environments with multiple devices of the same model, as it creates confusion and inefficiency by not allowing easy identification of individual devices.

    Proposed solution is to implement the ability to customize device names in Studio. This feature would allow administrators or users to rename devices according to their specific naming conventions or operational needs, making it easier to identify and manage multiple devices of the same model. This customization should be easily accessible from the device management interface…

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Studio  ·  Admin →

    We regret to inform you that this feature request has been declined. Our product team has determined that it is not aligned with our product roadmap or does not bring enough value to our platform to justify its implementation. We appreciate your continued feedback and look forward to hearing about future ideas.


    In Flow Connect, there is no longer the need for Device Approval using a standardized IDP with MFA.

  4. Currently, in WebNG, all users have visibility to the "Settings" tab on the sidebar, regardless of their permission levels. This one-size-fits-all visibility can lead to potential concerns or confusion among users who do not require access to these settings.

    Proposed solution is to Implement a feature that allows the "Settings" tab visibility to be controlled based on user permissions. This would enable administrators to configure the sidebar such that the "Settings" tab is hidden from users who do not have the necessary permissions to modify application settings. This enhancement would improve both the usability and security of WebNG by ensuring…

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  5. We propose the implementation of advanced conditional formatting options for text within the Data Tree Portlet in Portal 2. Specifically, the ability to customize text appearance (color, style, etc.) based on conditions, such as distinguishing between unassigned and assigned work. This enhancement would significantly improve visual clarity and streamline data interpretation within the Portlet.

    6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Portal 2  ·  Admin →

    We regret to inform you that this feature request has been declined. Our product team has determined that it is not aligned with our product roadmap or does not bring enough value to our platform to justify its implementation. We appreciate your continued feedback and look forward to hearing about future ideas.

  6. The ability to edit data in a true table grid format, rather than having a separate screen for each record, refers to a user interface design where data is presented in a tabular structure that resembles a Excel format

    23 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    We regret to inform you that this feature request has been declined. Our product team has determined that it is not aligned with our product roadmap or does not bring enough value to our platform to justify its implementation. We appreciate your continued feedback and look forward to hearing about future ideas.

  7. I want to be able to configure an interval and a number of retries that would happen automatically without any user intervention before being considered "failed"

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Integration  ·  Admin →

    We regret to inform you that this feature request has been declined. Our product team has determined that it is not aligned with our product roadmap or does not bring enough value to our platform to justify its implementation. We appreciate your continued feedback and look forward to hearing about future ideas.

  8. We have utilized some generally good programming concepts and have about 30 flows that all rely on the same fragment. When we make a change to that fragment, we can now easily publish all these flows in our test environment.

    However, what we would like to do is share them all in one step, so that we can subscribe to the update in our production environment. Unfortunately, this proves to be a painstakingly long process, and with the passage of time, it will only exacerbate further.

    17 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Studio  ·  Admin →

    We regret to inform you that this feature request has been declined. Our product team has determined that it is not aligned with our product roadmap for Flow Classic. We appreciate your continued feedback and look forward to hearing about future ideas.


    Please see the upcoming changes that have been made to deploying applications in Flow Connect. The changes on Flow Connect will support this request.

  9. Allow the user to have a forgot password option at the login screen. This option would allow the user to reset their password for access to the client similarly to how other clients manage forgotten passwords.

    16 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    We regret to inform you that this feature request has been declined. Our product team has determined that it is not aligned with our product roadmap or does not bring enough value to our platform to justify its implementation. We appreciate your continued feedback and look forward to hearing about future ideas.


    Please be sure to look at the changes coming in Flow Connect. Passwords will be handled through a standard identity provider, including password resets.

  10. Sometimes I have VERY long arrows. When i highlight the arrow I can see it nicely, but as soon as I try to move it is not highlighted. I want to be able to see my separate arrows ESPECIALLY WHEN THEY overlap.

    A few options to consider.

    1. Allow me to color arrows different colors for visibility.

    2. Allow me to select an arrow and leave it “selected” so it stands out.

    3. Allow me to have a shorter arrow that goes to a “GO TO” element which is just a pointer to another element in the flow.

    7 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Studio  ·  Admin →

    We regret to inform you that this feature request has been declined. Our product team has determined that it is not aligned with our product roadmap or does not bring enough value to our platform to justify its implementation. We appreciate your continued feedback and look forward to hearing about future ideas.

  11. As a flow designer, I would like to see the Flow Task name and if possible also the Workflow Name for each of the log items. This would allow me to understand exactly where the problem is and shorten the time needed to fix the issue for the Flow users

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Studio  ·  Admin →

    We regret to inform you that this feature request has been declined. Our product team has determined that it is not aligned with our product roadmap or does not bring enough value to our platform to justify its implementation. We appreciate your continued feedback and look forward to hearing about future ideas.

  12. We have successfully implemented the inbox feature and have identified that the calendar button is not currently necessary for our workflow. To enhance user customization and streamline the interface, we kindly request the addition of a feature that allows users to add, remove, or disable specific navigation buttons, including the calendar button. This flexibility would empower users to tailor the platform to their unique needs, optimizing the user experience and increasing efficiency.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Studio  ·  Admin →

    We regret to inform you that this feature request has been declined. Our product team has determined that it is not aligned with our product roadmap or does not bring enough value to our platform to justify its implementation. We appreciate your continued feedback and look forward to hearing about future ideas.

  13. In the current version of Portal 2, users are limited to automatic width settings for table columns, lacking the flexibility that was available in Portal 1 where custom width values could be set during the configuration step. This limitation affects the usability and visual layout of tables, especially when dealing with varying content sizes that require more precise column adjustments.

    Proposed solution is to reintroduce the capability to set custom widths for table columns in Portal 2, similar to the functionality previously available in Portal 1. This feature should allow users to specify exact width values for each column during…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Portal 2  ·  Admin →
  14. Given a set of searched executions, I want to be able to bulk update the executions as handled or retry them all in a few clicks of a button.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Integration  ·  Admin →

    We regret to inform you that this feature request has been declined. Our product team has determined that it is not aligned with our product roadmap or does not bring enough value to our platform to justify its implementation. We appreciate your continued feedback and look forward to hearing about future ideas.

  15. In a lot of cases, the customer has a list of eg. 10 Time types, but he mostly only uses work and travel time. It would be great to have a function similar to "default", where you can define favorites that should be on top. Very similar to how we can define them in the inbox.

    Workaround is now to sort the list accordingly and solve it in flow script. But this would make life a bit easier.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    We regret to inform you that this feature request has been declined. Our product team has determined that it is not aligned with our product roadmap or does not bring enough value to our platform to justify its implementation. We appreciate your continued feedback and look forward to hearing about future ideas.

  16. it would be highly advantageous to introduce the ability to execute this script as an option within a REST Service call. Currently, the REST Service connector parameters only offer limited choices such as "Variable," "Constant," and "Not Set." By incorporating this script execution as an alternative, it would empower users to execute more intricate operations within the flow, thereby providing greater flexibility and customization to the process.

    11 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Studio  ·  Admin →

    We regret to inform you that this feature request has been declined in Flow Classic track. After careful consideration, our product team has concluded that it does not align with the established product roadmap for Flow Classic, nor does it offer sufficient value to justify its implementation. We appreciate the feedback you have provided and remain open to hearing about future ideas.

    That being said, we encourage you to explore the recent enhancements made to the REST connector in Flow Connect. The REST connector within Flow Connect already accommodates this particular request. Additionally, we are actively seeking beta customers for Flow Connect. If you are interested, please reach out to your local account manager for further details.

  17. We would like to get more information on the error when an error is thrown by the remote system when communicating through the web service connector. Sometimes there is not much information available to the user or developer for that part. It would be great if this error in full could be written to the error log file which would make debugging this a lot easier. And of course also present the correct error message in full to the user.

    10 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Connectors  ·  Admin →

    We regret to inform you that this feature request has been declined. Our product team has determined that it is not aligned with our product roadmap or does not bring enough value to our platform to justify its implementation. We appreciate your continued feedback and look forward to hearing about future ideas.

  18. When a process is changed or altered it takes manual testing of scenarios. It takes time of a QA resource to a somewhat a repetitive task.

    It would be nice to have a a process to record test scenarios (and incrementally add new scenarios, value combinations etc.) so those previously envisioned scenarios can be tested automatically every time something changes in the flow.

    Feature could give out a summary of the testing along with the scenarios, values or flow steps that got failed during the testing

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Studio  ·  Admin →

    We regret to inform you that this feature request has been declined. Our product team has determined that it is not aligned with our product roadmap or does not bring enough value to our platform to justify its implementation. We appreciate your continued feedback and look forward to hearing about future ideas.

  19. We would like to have new feature add to document viewer in order to view multiple pdf(s) in portal. Currently, when one clicks the table row (with a listener attached), they need to view particular line related Documents.

    9 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Portal 2  ·  Admin →

    We regret to inform you that this feature request has been declined. Our product team has determined that it is not aligned with our product roadmap or does not bring enough value to our platform to justify its implementation. We appreciate your continued feedback and look forward to hearing about future ideas.

  20. Just like in Multi/Single Selection Lists in a user step, it would be nice to have the same grouping feature in data grids.
    On the attached picture, the grey rows should be the grouping and not a 'normal' row.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    We regret to inform you that this feature request has been declined. Our product team has determined that it is not aligned with our product roadmap or does not bring enough value to our platform to justify its implementation. We appreciate your continued feedback and look forward to hearing about future ideas.

← Previous 1 3
  • Don't see your idea?